From the category archives:

Business

When is it ok to be a tall poppy?

by danu on August 7, 2008

New to my blog? You may want to think about subscribing to be notified of new posts. Thanks for visiting!

Abetter question would be - when is it NOT ok to be a tall poppy? There is a mentality among some parts of the country, a throwback to the days of class society, that says you shouldn't have ideas above your station. Australia, a nation founded by cast-offs from this section of society, has this idea deeply entrenched in its soul. In Australian culture, heroes are the ones who stay true to their roots, the 'true-blue' Aussies. You can be an actor, war hero, sportsman or murderer - so long as you're true blue, we love ya. The worst thing you can be in Australia is a snob.

At the risk of being called such, I believe that mentality is total ignorant garbage. Seriously. If it's snobbery to think you're better at something than someone else, what are you supposed to do if you actually are? Pretend you're not so you don't offend anybody? Modesty is one thing, but dumbing yourself down to be acceptable is wrong. Acceptable to whom? If it's more important to other people that you fit in than reach your potential, are these the kind of people you need in your life?

From the moment you're born, people are lining up to impress upon you the idea that you can be anything you want. That's nice, and it has the added bonus of being true. But you soon discover that if following your dreams involves something other than sport or one of the few other culturally approved pursuits, you're going to have to go somewhere else to do it. Which means you are confronted with a choice to stay and make the best of it or to go follow your calling. Through the frame of Australian culture as a whole, if you choose to go, but manage to stay 'true blue', you're a hero. If you go and don't look back, you're a snob and good riddance. It doesn't actually matter what you do or whether you succeed or fail, it only matters what you think about Australia.

This represents a deep and abiding cultural insecurity - a nation's need for constant reassurance to help assuage its low self-esteem. This observation will be hotly denied of course by those who choose not to see the problem. For it is a problem, and an absurd one at that. The truth is Australia is an incredibly blessed country full of natural wonders, amazing people and untapped potential. But as anyone who knows a gifted person with low self-esteem can vouch, it doesn't matter how obviously brilliant they are, low self-esteem will somehow sabotage everything they do. In this light, Australia's obsession with cutting down tall poppies is both understandable and tragic.

The truth is - it is ALWAYS ok to be a tall poppy. Tall poppies show strength, possibility and hope. And yet they are still poppies, true to their roots. We should welcome them and appreciate them, not seek to cut them down at the first opportunity. If we were more accepting towards tall poppies perhaps they would be less suspicious and aloof.

It is the right and indeed the duty of each and every one of us to be the tallest, fullest flowers we can be. What good does it serve others or ourselves if we waste potential that could have been used?

Why should following your dreams mean you have to go elsewhere? Why force people to make that choice? For a small country, Australia produces some of the best and brightest leaders in all sorts of fields. Yet they almost always leave to pursue their careers overseas, simply because there is so little opportunity to do so here. Certainly most would stay if they could. Each time we let one go we let go of a chance to pull ourselves higher as a nation, thereby only reinforcing the same problem.

Australia needs to look forwards. Instead of cutting down tall poppies we should grow to meet them.

{ 1 comment }

In Case You Missed It - #2

by danu on August 5, 2008

More of those must-see links from the last few days...

Google Maps - Street View

The big news of the last 24 hours is the new 'street view' feature of the already amazing Google Maps service. The Googlies have obviously been busy driving around the whole world with a camera hanging out the window, because you can now get a full 3D perspective of just about any address you care to look up. Incredible stuff. I wonder how much productivity is going down the drain right now as people check out their own homes all over the world.

'The Googling' - Part 1

If you've just checked out your address on Google Maps Street View and are kinda amazed and a little freaked out by it all, you're not alone. In Part 1 of a five part series of short films, two ordinary guys discover just how creepy technology can really be. It's funny and well done. Check out 'The Googling' at YouTube.

Who knew car parks could be fun?

The developers of the Eureka Tower in Melbourne got a little fancy when it came to designing their carpark. They hired German designer Axel Peemöller to come up with a funky way of painting signs on the walls to show drivers which way to go. Just goes to show good design is good design wherever it is. The full gallery is available on Axel's website.

Hollywood figures out how to make web video pay

Well, kindasorta. Wired has a great in-depth article about what some of the more progressive people in the movie biz are doing to adapt to new business and distribution models brought about by the web. There's some great ideas in there, a must-read for anyone in the film/tv world.

More than 6 fonts on the web? At last?

Web designers know all about the pains of only being able to use six BORING fonts on the web. We're looking at YOU Internet Explorer! Well it looks like that might finally be about to change. A new CSS facility lets designers embed fonts into their websites. Find out more about it over at the WebMonkey blog.

{ 0 comments }

In Case You Missed It - #1

by danu on July 31, 2008

From now on instead of posting links to interesting things individually as I find them I'll wait until I get half a dozen or so and then post them together in a digest like this.

Every day I spend 2 to 3 hours reading, watching and researching. During this time I see hundreds of interesting things. Here are some of the best. Enjoy!

Free!

Chris Anderson, editor of Wired Magazine, author of The Long Tail and perhaps the most far-sighted man in Silicon Valley, has a new book due out soon. Everything that goes digital eventually goes free. Find out why $0.00 is the future of business.

Microsoft tries to convince people Vista doesn't suck

Apple's Mac and PC ads are starting to bite and Windows Vista is still a colossal flop and embarrassment 18 months after its launch. In response, Microsoft has conducted an 'experiment' in which people who don't like Vista are shown a secret new version of Windows which they instantly fall in love with. Turns out it was Vista all along! The people in this video are real, but are clearly computer noobs. Watch the video and see what you think. To me it seems equivalent to responding to someone who has read a bad review of a car by showing them a sales brochure for the same car. The actual virtues of the car itself don't come into it because the person has never driven it. I'd love to see Microsoft try this experiment with someone who has actually used a computer before.

What makes people gay?

That's what John Barrowman sets out to find in this BBC documentary. Barrowman, the Scottish star of Doctor Who spinoff Torchwood, married his boyfriend last year. In the documentary, filmed in America, John challenges scientists to explain why he's gay. With the help of friends, family, psychologists and geneticists, he asks whether nature or nurture determine what we are. The Making of Me was the highest rating program on UK television when it aired this week. BBC have made it available online but only for UK viewers. Those with Bit Torrent clients will find a link to a working torrent file here.


China cleans up its air for Olympics

And this is the result! Beijing has a scale by which air pollution is measured. 100 is considered not great, 200 is bad and has been recorded many times in the last decade. Sometimes it even gets to 500. This picture, taken last week after anti-smog measures had been introduced, rates 113. No wonder the athletes are concerned.

Crazy right-wing nuts hijack public debate

Ever heard of the Overton Window? That's the name given to the idea that debate about an issue takes place within a certain range of views, focussing on mainstream beliefs with crazier fringe opinions at the edges. The idea of 'moving the Overton Window' is that by putting the crazy ideas out into the public arena more often, they become closer to the mainstream. Progressives say this is the technique that FOX news and other far right-wing voices use to hijack the political agenda. No need to back up what you're saying, just say it loud enough and often enough and people will consider your ideas normal and the other guy's ideas even crazier and more extreme. This blog looks at how this happens in Australian politics and media.

{ 0 comments }

What’s happening to this blog?

by danu on July 31, 2008

In yesterday's post I shared my traffic and advertising stats for this blog over the last six months and set some new goals for the blog for the rest of this year. Those goals are:

    1. Establish and maintain a clear focus and purpose
    2. Build a loyal base of subscribers
    3. Raise my profile and reputation

How am I going to work towards those goals? What changes can you expect to see on this blog in the coming weeks and months? Let's start by looking at each goal separately:

Establish and maintain a clear focus and purpose

To succeed in professional blogging you need a clear content strategy. Readers need to know they can expect to read posts that centre around a certain theme or topic. They come to expect a certain standard, style and frequency of posts. You need to be able to explain clearly in a single sentence what your blog is about.

So far I have been far from clear. I've posted about anything and everything that I thought was interesting, from politics to environmental issues to technology, civil rights, creative industry and odd bits of quirky humour. There's nothing wrong with covering a wide range of topics, indeed some people like the variety, but there needs to be a theme that holds everything together. I have changed themes several times already, looking for the right fit. I believe I have found the answer.
[click to continue...]

{ 0 comments }

Now that I've decided to pursue writing seriously, it's worth taking a look at how this blog has been doing in the six months since I started it. How much traffic does it get? How much money does it earn? I'll get into specifics shortly, but first here's some background.

I started this blog as an experiment to achieve 3 goals:

    1. To see if I can sustain a regular writing habit
    2. To learn the technical aspects of blogging
    3. To see if anyone is interested in what I have to say

How did the experiment go?
[click to continue...]

{ 5 comments }

Sod it - From now on I’m a writer

by danu on July 28, 2008

Ever had one of those moments like the first time you get on an airplane and life as you know it just drops away? A change in consciousness. A new beginning. I had one today. From today, I'm leaving behind my past life as a businessman, salesman and 'computer guy'. From now on, I'm a writer.

I've been writing for a while already in my spare time of course, and hoping that eventually I'd find some way to make a living from it. The problem with that is, as long as I do it in my spare time, as long as I'm 'hoping', it doesn't matter if it never happens. It can always be a dream. I can always pretend I would've been successful at it if I'd only had more time, more money, more connections, whatever.

The truth is, I will never find out if I have what it takes to make a living as a writer unless I try it. I would rather try it and fail than keep wondering. I have failed at things before and it wasn't so bad. I built up a computer training and graphic design business from scratch, threw everything I had at it for several years and it failed. It sent me bankrupt. I don't care if what I try fails. I only care if I fail to try.

I have spent most of my life doing things that involve leading or teaching people. It just seems to happen. Whenever I'm with a bunch of people I end up as leader unless I make a conscious effort not to. I have always been somewhat puzzled by this, but in my various dealings with people I have discovered two things:

    1) People tell me I explain things well
    2) I seem to inspire people

The first is mostly a product of my personality I'm fairly sure. I like to think and analyse things to learn how they work, especially abstract and complex things. Then I like to share what I've discovered so that others can experience the joy I derive from understanding things.

The second is more puzzling to me. I don't set out to inspire people. From my attempts to find out why people find me inspiring it seems to me to be mostly because I follow my own path. I don't set out to be a rule-breaker but I choose not to follow the ones that pander to weakness and mediocrity. This is because life is short and there isn't time to waste on crap. There is no time to be too afraid of life to live it. It is over all too soon. Instead of running at the pace of the slowest person, I believe in helping the slowest person run faster. That's pretty much all you need to know about me really.

Writing seems to be a natural fit for these two qualities. I have a good reputation already as someone who understands computers and makes them accessible to people. I tend to generate a 'buzz' with whatever I get involved in. I'm fairly sure this is the main reason my business got as far as it did. It really wasn't that well-structured and it never came close to making any money, but there was always a buzz about what we were doing.

The problem with the business in the end and with working as a computer trainer was that no matter how exciting it can be, it was always about what someone else wanted. For someone who has natural ability at many things, it can be surprisingly difficult to follow your true passions. It's sometimes hard to differentiate between the satisfaction that comes from the adulation of others and the satisfaction that comes from doing what truly makes you happy.

Sometimes, looking back, the directions life takes can be telling. I have always enjoyed writing since I was little. I had a poem published in the school newsletter in Year 1. I wrote short stories and started several novels before my teens before invariably losing interest when distracted by the next exciting thing. My written exams and assignments always received top marks and I incurred the wrath of many teachers who hated the fact I never wrote drafts and just wrote the finished version the day it was due.

Eventually I hit some troubled times in my teenage years. I stopped writing, though that was not a conscious decision at the time. I also stopped doing a lot of the things that made me happy. I became Serious. I spent my time with serious people whom I suspect now also did not do things that made them happy. Somehow I had convinced myself that feeding my soul was like feeding the stray cat - it would only come back for more and I'd end up having to look after it.

Being myself meant I would have to face up to being different to everyone else, and at that time what I wanted more than anything else was to be liked and accepted. Eventually that idea fell apart when I realised I didn't really like or accept any of these crazy people I was associating myself with.

Things truly changed last year when I discovered something important. When the business I was running fell apart, I didn't. Some of the people, things and ideas I had in my life were there because of what I could do, some were part of my life because of the person I was. When the business failed, it suddenly became clear which was which.

Failure and the resulting bankruptcy gave me freedom. Freedom to find myself, freedom to be myself. It was hard at first. I felt like I had nothing and was nothing. But little by little I've been putting the pieces together and finding who I am. In doing so I've been surprised not only to find that I like myself a lot, but also that I've been here the whole time. Best of all, I am free.

So from now on, I'm a writer. I'm going to make a living by having interesting ideas and sharing them with people through writing. I don't know how exactly I will do this, but I have some interesting ideas about that so I'll start by sharing those in my next post. In fact I'll be sharing my whole journey in this new career. In my next post I'll write about how much money I've made so far from this blog, how much traffic I get and where it comes from. I'll set some goals for myself for my new writing career and report back in 30 days to tell you how I'm doing.

I'm excited and grateful that the technology exists to share this experience as it happens with anyone who wants to know. If you're interested in following, why not subscribe to my RSS feed? If you're not sure how an RSS feed works, read this.

Go to the next post >

{ 1 comment }

Newspapers give themselves enough rope

by danu on July 17, 2008

In follow up to yesterday's article about the future of journalism, it's worth mentioning that the Wall Street Journal, recently acquired by Rupert Murdoch's Newscorp, has lifted its cover price by 50 cents in what can only be described as a short-sighted move.

Here's what Crikey publisher Eric Beecher has to say about the short-sightedness of newspaper publishers:

This week's news that The Wall Street Journal is hiking its cover price from $1.50 to $2.00 -- just a year after raising it from $1 to $1.50 -- is further evidence of the desperation of newspaper publishers in response to the unravelling economics of their medium.

Under enormous pressure to prop up their bottom lines, newspapers in most developed countries are resorting to a cocktail of short-term measures that could have a quite devastating medium-term impact on the quality of their editorial franchises:

  • Increase the cover price -- which generates more revenue in the short term but inevitably leads to lower circulation and visibility.
    Print fewer newspapers (because there are fewer buyers) -- which saves money on printing and newsprint.

  • Employ fewer journalists -- which saves money on salaries and expenses but inevitably leads to a decline in editorial breadth and quality.
  • Cut other editorial costs (foreign bureaus, Canberra staff, travel, research, freelances) -- same effect as above.
  • Produce fewer pages -- which saves money on newsprint but results in a diminished service to readers.
  • The result of this potent cocktail is that in order to meet short-term shareholder demands newspapers are steadily reinventing themselves as high-priced niche printed products, precisely at the same time as the internet is becoming the most powerful low-priced niche content platform in history.

    All this is happening at the same time as chilly economic winds are buffetting newspaper advertising revenues, classified advertising continues to migrate to the internet and -- not surprisingly in view of all this turbulence -- investor sentiment about newspapers is decimating their share prices.

    Becoming a more niched product is less of a problem for a specialist paper like The Wall Street Journal, because that's essentially what it is already, but for general interest broadsheet newspapers the road to nichdom can very quickly turn into a narrow laneway.

    The people who always succeed in difficult circumstances are the ones with the courage and innovation to be bold and idealistic. Whither they?

    { 0 comments }